A new study published today reports that overweight and obese patients get the same or better quality of health care than “normal” weight patients.
Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania say they looked at quality of care across eight performance measures among Medicare and VA patients, and found no difference in the kinds of treatments doctors prescribed for obese and non-obese patients.
According to a s tory on MedPage Today, “Performance measures included diabetes care management (such as lipid and HbA1c monitoring and eye tests), pneumococcal vaccination, influenza vaccination, screening mammography, colorectal cancer screening, and cervical cancer screening.” The story goes on to quote one of the researchers commenting that while doctors do “harbor negative attitudes” toward heavier patients, that prejudice doesn’t affect the quality of care delivered.
I think this is a pretty grandiose conclusion to draw from such a limited study, and the researchers themselves cautioned against extrapolating these results too broadly. To me, the study raises some interesting questions: Are doctors more tolerant of overweight vets and/or poorer patients? Is “quality of care” strictly a function of which treatments are recommended?
I don’t think so. I wonder what the patients would have to say about the quality of care they received–not just the treatment recommendations (which are of course important) but the relationship they had with their docs, and how it affects their long-term care. I wonder whether these two populations typically have long-term relationships with the same doctor, or whether they often see a revolving cast of medical providers, and whether that might make doctors react differently to them than to patients they see regularly.
Thoughts?
Leave a Reply